Why? Because despite the presence of sidewalks, almost everything about this area is ACTIVELY HOSTILE to pedestrians.
* There is no pedestrian-friendly paths from the sidewalk to any of the strip-mall destinations along the road. None! There is no walkway from the sidewalks to the Target mall, or even to the post office! You have to leave the sidewalk, and walk into the same paved way that cars are turning into, crossing a traffic-filled asphalt parking lot, to actually get anywhere.
In the case of the restaurant-filled mall across from the post office (Big Fresh Cafe, Boston Market, etc.), there is an active guard rail barrier preventing anyone from walking through from the street -- the only way in is by using the place where all the cars are streaming into the parking lot.
In fact, the ONLY place in that immediate area with a pedestrian alternative from the sidewalk to the business is the McDonald's. Sad commentary, Framingham.
* There is no buffer or screening of any kind between sidewalk and rushing traffic. This tends to make walking an unpleasant experience overall, scaring off all but the hardiest, most dedicated walkers.
Oh, and if you want to walk from, say, Stop & Shop or BJs on Old Connecticut Path through to Rte. 30? This is Framingham's idea of providing pedestrian access. Yes, some painted lines in the roadway saying "pedestrian walkway."
Husband and I laugh. We call it 'doing a Bryson' when we have to drive from lot to lot after bill Bryson's comments about the very same issue in Kittery Maine.
ReplyDeleteAnd it is a very sad commentary.
Oy! I remember back when I worked in that office building next to Bennigant's and would walkt to the post office at lunch - always fun. Now imagine living in the Lord Chesterfield apartments (double ugh!).
ReplyDeleteIt's really a pity, because that area could have been so different. There's no reason the same retail couldn't have been developed in a pedestrian-friendly way. Sigh.
ReplyDelete