December 4, 2008

Saxonville Riverview Plaza update

Sorry for the lengthy time between posts, but the demise of my home computer has put a lot of my blogging time into setting up my replacement computer! However, I would like to belatedly report on the first Planning Board public hearing on this project last month. All the audience members who spoke, said they were in favor. In fact, several urged the Board to approve the project quickly, since it's very much a benefit to the town to have that long-vacant town parcel finally developed.

I, too, am in favor, although asked for a couple of small plan modifications.

One issue raised by several people, including Planning Board Members, was to make sure the sidewalk continues into the parcel to the shops so there's an obvious walkway into the site and not just driveway for cars. Another is making sure the intersection by A Street is a safe crossing for pedestrians, considering how many area residents and high school students walk in the neighborhood.

The other issue I'm most concerned about is the driveway out of the parcel, which is three lanes wide -- one lane too wide for creating an appealing and safe-feeling walking environment. I urged there be some separation between the incoming and outgoing lanes to create a better walking environment. However, the last time I walked by the parcel, there were drawings on the pavement showing the three-lane-wide driveway. I suggest someone try walking on Rte. 30 across the cars pouring in and out between Target and Lowe's to get a sense of what a wide and busy driveway does to your walking environment.

The Framingham Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee is going to discuss the project at its meeting this Tuesday, December 9, in the Memorial Building (Town Hall) Conference Room 2 (that's on the agenda starting at 8:10, the overall meeting begins at 7:30). You can see the initial letter they sent to the Planning Board about the project here.

2 comments:

  1. [...]   Planning Livable Communities Sorry for the lengthy time between posts, but the demise of my home computer has put a lot of my blogging time into setting up my replacement computer! However, I would like to belatedly report on the first Planning Board public hearing on this project last month. All the audience members who spoke, said they [...] Go to Source Tags: [...]

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sharon,

    I emailed you last week but I think I must have had the address wrong. I have a html newsletter about trail development in the region and I wanted to foward you a story about this project in Framingham--that is a part of this newsletter.

    Here's part of it. . . .

    Here's something key that hasn't been mentioned. A portion of the development will be built on or next to the former railroad corridor. This means that will trigger a hearing by the Secretary of Transportation under the 40/54A statute before the local building inspector can issue a building permit.. Here's the rules from EOT surrounding this program. Here's my letter to the Framingham Building Inspector about all of this.
    A conversation about integrating the trail will either be done early on with the local boards, or it will be later before the Secretary of Transportation.

    Here's a hint. Certain developers in Clinton and Watertown will tell how they integrated the future trail into their facility--at the hearing in Boston. They can also tell you how they wished the conversation took place at the local level-- early on.

    Please email me and I send it all to you.

    Best regards,

    Craig Della Penna

    ReplyDelete